INTRODUCTION
A person’s property rights provide them with liberty, security, and control over their life, making them one of the most significant aspects of human rights. Since property rights guarantee financial security and shield women from social and economic reliance on men, they are much more significant for women. Women’s property rights have long been a complicated issue in a culture like India, where family structures and traditions are closely linked to religion and tradition. In the past, Indian women’s rights to inherit or possess property were severely restricted. In many societies, women were expected to rely on their husbands, fathers, brothers or sons for financial support, and property was mostly passed down through the male line. Reforms and contemporary legislation, however, have attempted to modify this status and grant women equal rights in inheritance and ownership over time. There are many different religions in India, and each one has its own unique rules concerning property, marriage, and succession. Christian, Parsi, and Jewish groups agree to the Indian Succession Act, 1925; Muslim law discusses the mahr and set shares for women; and Hindu law created the concept of Stridhan.. These frameworks all demonstrate how women’s property rights are viewed and exercised differently in India.
WHAT ARE THE WOMEN RIGHTS?
Women’s rights are the liberties and rights granted to them in order to guarantee justice, equality, and dignity in society. Women around the world were denied respect and opportunities as males for centuries. They were frequently viewed as second-class citizens, restricted to domestic work, and denied access to education, real estate, and decision-making opportunities. This situation was progressively altered by women’s rights movements, which called for equal treatment and acceptance of women as autonomous beings. The ability of women to live freely, safely, and equally in all areas of life that is political, social, economic, and personal. These rights include the ability to vote, the ability to receive an education, the ability to work, the ability to inherit and own property, the ability to choose one’s own spouse, family, and motherhood, and the freedom from discrimination and abuse.
Women’s rights in India have changed over time. Ancient texts frequently supported women’s status, but as time went on, societal norms limited their liberties. Women now possess the same legal rights as men and enjoy equality as citizens, ensured through statutory laws and constitutional protections. In addition to providing privileges, women’s rights also aim to guarantee justice and fairness in everyday transactions. The fundamental freedoms and rights that women possess that enable them to live in equality and dignity without facing discrimination are known as women’s rights. In terms of education, employment, property, marriage, and politics, these rights guarantee women the same opportunities as males. Women’s rights are a collection of privileges and safeguards established to ensure women’s equality in the political, economic, cultural, and social spheres. To put it simply, it means that women should be treated equally to men and should have equal opportunities to develop, achieve, and lead secure lives.
Inheritance, financial independence, and property are essential components of women’s rights that provide them with safety, autonomy, and social equality. The authority that women have over inheritance and property is one of the most significant aspects of their rights. Historically, women were not allowed to inherit family property, possess land, or even handle their own income they were dependent on their dad, husbands, brothers or sons. Property rights allow women to purchase, sell, and own real estate in their own names. A woman who possesses inheritance rights is entitled to the same portion of family property as her brothers or other male relatives.
For instance, daughters are now equal heirs to ancestral property under the 1956 Hindu Succession Act and its 2005 Act .In a similar vein, women have rights to inherit property in Muslim, Christian, Parsi, and Jewish law, albeit the regulations vary depending on the religion. Here, independence is equally important. Women are financially independent because of their property and inheritance rights. Today, women are now independent, and they can make decisions regarding their own lives, including their careers, marriages, and educational paths.
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HISTORY AND MODERN PERIOD
The status of women’s property rights in India has changed significantly from ancient times to the present legal system. In the ancient and medieval periods, women’s rights were severely restricted. Hindu women were permitted to own Stridhan, which comprises money, presents, and jewels given at marriage, but they were not given authority over joint family property. The Quran, on the other side, outlined Muslim women’s inheritance rights; yet, in practice, these rights were often restricted by patriarchal customs and social pressure. The British codified personal laws throughout the colonial era, although they mainly maintained religious customs. Instead of challenging male supremacy, the codified laws of Islam and Hinduism represented selective innovations that strengthened it. While the Indian Succession Act of 1925 established guidelines for Christians and Parsis, it also failed to establish a uniform legal framework and represented gender inequality. The Indian Constitution’s emphasis on equality pushed for improvements after independence. Daughters were granted inheritance rights by the Hindu Succession Act of 1956, but they were not allowed supreme powers over joint family property. Reforms were not uniformly enforced across religions because previous personal rules remained for Christians, Parsis, and Muslims.
The 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, which gave females the same legal status as sons and brought property rights into line with the equality ideals of the constitution, was a significant breakthrough. Although women’s empowerment through property ownership is becoming more widely acknowledged in the modern era, disparities under personal laws continue to draw attention to the divide between equality and tradition.

RELIGION WISE STUDY OF WOMEN’S PROPERTY RIGHTS ININDIA
Due to the application of personal laws, women’s property rights in India vary depending on their faith. With the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act of 2005, women were granted equal rights in Hindu law with regard to ancestral property. Muslim law allows women to inherit property, although they often only get half of what men in comparable relationships receive. Although Parsi law guarantees equal inheritance for sons and daughters under the Indian Succession Act, there are still certain gender-based disparities in spousal rights. Although widows frequently receive a small portion, Christian law grants daughters equal inheritance under the Indian Succession Act. Women’s property rights thus show both advancement and disparity in terms of religion.
Hindu Law
Hindu law, which is among the oldest personal law systems in India, regulates Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Vaishnavism and Hindus. Hindu society has traditionally been a shared family arrangement, with males controlling the majority of the property. Mostly dependent on their fathers, husbands, or sons, women had few rights to inherit or hold property. In terms of property, Hindu women became more secure and independent over time as a result of reforms and legal actions. The concept of marital property is that the assets hold by a woman prior to or obtains during her marriage are referred to as marital property. The wife’s independence was traditionally restricted because the husband controlled the majority of the property she bought. But according to contemporary Hindu law, a woman’s property ; whether inherited, acquired, or given as a gift remains hers even after marriage. She is free to independently manage, sell, or give away her property. This guarantees that women are not totally reliant on their spouse and her family and maintain some degree of financial control inside the marriage. The process of transferring property after a person’s death is known as inheritance. In the past, women, particularly daughters, had limited access to ancestral property under Hindu inheritance laws. Daughters frequently received little or no share because sons were favoured. Women were acknowledged as legitimate heirs by the historic Hindu Succession Act of 1956, which gave them the right to inherit assets from their parents, spouses, and other family members. By giving daughters equal co-ownership rights that is, the ability to demand partition if necessary and to share ancestral property equally with sons the 2005 amendment significantly enhanced women’s rights. Stridhan is a unique type of property that is only owned by women. Gifts, jewellery, money, real estate, and other possessions acquired prior to, during, or after marriage are all included. The woman’s husband and his family are unable to claim Stridhan, which is still her sole property. Courts have maintained that Stridhan is an essential component of Hindu women’s property rights since it gives them independence and financial stability. The rights to inheritance of women were established by the Hindu Succession Act of 1956. A significant step toward equality was the 2005 amendment, which recognized daughters as owners and gave them the same rights as sons in relation to family property.
Muslim law
In India, Muslims’ domestic matters, such as marriage, divorce, and inheritance, are governed by Muslim law. The Quran, Hadith, and Islamic customs are its main sources of inspiration. Though they have been specifically established by personal and religious rules to give women security and financial independence, Muslim women’s property rights differ from Hindu law. Mahr, also known as Mehr, is a fundamental idea of marital property in Muslim law. At the moment of marriage, the husband is required to give the woman a gift or payment known as mahr. It may take the shape of cash, real estate, jewellery, or other priceless possessions. The husband and his family are unable to take away Mahr, which is the wife’s sole property. Mahr’s goal is to give the wife financial stability during their marriage and in the event of a divorce or widowhood.
Mahr has two types:-
- Prompt Mahr–given to the wife immediately at the time of marriage.
- Deferred Mahr – promised to the wife and payable at a later date, often in case of divorce or death of the husband.
Inheritance and Quranic Shares -The particular shares specified in the Quran serve as the guidelines for inheritance under Muslim law. Each and every Muslim woman is entitled to inherit from her parents, spouse, and other family members. A girl usually gets half of a son’s portion, for instance. If a husband has children, a woman is entitled to one-eighth of his property; if not, she is entitled to one-fourth. The Quran makes clear that these shares give women legal financial security.
Sunni and Shia Disparities in Personal Law Practices-There are differences in Muslim personal law between the Shia and Sunni populations. With a few minor variations, Sunni law is based on the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, or Hanbali schools. According to Shia law, which is primarily Ithna Ashari, daughters and wives are frequently given separate shares in property and inheritance. The fundamental principles of Mahr, established inheritance shares, and women’s financial protection are universal in all Muslim societies, despite these variations. Although considering that the division may be different from Hindu law, these rules guarantee Muslim women’s legally recognized rights to inheritance and property.
Christian Law
In India, Christian law mostly regulates Christians’ private affairs, such as marriage, inheritance, and property rights. Instead of being founded on religious texts, Christian law is primarily codified by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, in contrast to Hindu or Muslim law. This law gives Christian women financial security and independence by guaranteeing them written legal rights regarding inheritance and marital property. All assets that a wife possesses prior to or gains during marriage are considered marital property under Christian law. A Christian woman is fully in charge of her personal belongings, whether they be gifts, money earned, or assets she inherited from her parents. She is not dependent on her spouse to manage, sell, or give this property. Christian women are protected by this arrangement from having to depend on their husbands or other male family members for financial support. Christian marriages in India typically follow a monogamy system, in contrast to certain other societies, and each spouse’s property is handled separately unless it is acquired jointly. Because of this, a wife’s property is still hers, and her husband does not automatically own it.
Under the Indian Succession Act of 1925, inheritance
The Indian Succession Act of 1925 also governs Christian women’s inheritance. In accordance with this law: –
- A Christian woman may inherit assets from her spouse, parents, or other family members.
- A Christian man’s wife and children are entitled to a legal portion of his wealth if he passes away intestate, meaning he left no testament.
- In order to ensure her financial stability, a widow is entitled to maintenance from her late husband’s inheritance.
- Christian women have a fair share of family assets since sons and daughters get an equal inheritance from their parents’ possessions.
Women’s rights are clearly recognized under the Indian Succession Act, which protects them against property rejection or divorce. It enhances Christian women’s economic independence in India while finding a balance between custom and the law. Christian law ensures that marital property and inheritance are fairly safeguarded under the law by taking a simple and formal approach to women’s property rights.

Parsi Law
The Parsi community’s personal affairs in India, such as marriage, inheritance, and property rights, are governed by Parsi law. The Indian Succession Act of 1925, in addition to the community’s customs, governs Parsi law, in contrast to that of Muslims and Hindus. In terms of inheritance and marital property, Parsi women have particular rights that give them independence and financial stability. All assets acquired by the woman before or after the marriage are considered marital property under Parsi law. The property that a Parsi woman takes into marriage is hers to keep and manage. In a similar vein, she is still the owner of any assets she inherited from her parents or obtained directly. Parsi households generally adhere to a more individualistic property system, which guarantees that women can freely manage, sell, or give their property, in contrast to the joint family system outlined in Hindu law. Parsi women in marriage have more financial independence thanks to this strategy. The Indian Succession Act, 1925, which superseded previous customary laws and established women’s rights in property concerns, substantially governs inheritance for Parsi women.
In accordance with this law:-
- A Parsi woman is eligible to inherit her mother’s and father’s assets.
- If her husband dies, she is entitled to a widow’s share.
Although the exact share may differ based on whether the property is inherited or self-acquired, daughters inherit equally with sons.
Due to social conventions, Parsi women are protected from being refused property or disinherited by the Indian Succession Act, which guarantees them legally recognized rights. In addition, these rights have been continuously maintained by courts, providing women with economic and family stability and empowerment. Parsi law strikes a balance between tradition and contemporary legal frameworks by combining statutory protection with individual conventions. Women’s independence and equality within the community are strengthened by acknowledging their ownership and inheritance rights. Christians and Parsis are subject to statutory law, but Hindu and Muslim rules are mostly based on personal or religious laws. This is the primary difference between the two groups. This leads to disparities in the degree of equality. Personal laws occasionally uphold gender-based disparities, despite statutory laws’ objectives of equality and justice. All things considered, despite advancements, social pressures, ignorance, and cultural norms continue to hinder women’s ability to exercise these rights in many places. The Constitution serves as a compass, promoting changes that close the gaps between individual laws and the ideals of equality.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ACROSS RELIGIONS
Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Indian Constitution protect the right to live with dignity, equality before the law, and non-discrimination based on sex. Religious perspectives on women’s property rights show both similarities and differences. Women are considered to be the exclusive owners of Stridhan under Hindu law, and daughters now have the same property rights as sons following the 2005 amendment. Although Mahr and Quranic inheritance shares provide protection for women under Muslim law, their part is often half that of a male heir, demonstrating inequality. According to the Indian Succession Act of 1925, widows are entitled to a legal portion of property, and Christian and Parsi women inherit it equally with their sons. Christians and Parsis are subject to statutory law, but Hindu and Muslim rules are mostly based on personal or religious laws. This is the primary difference between the two groups. This leads to disparities in the degree of equality. Personal laws occasionally uphold gender-based disparities, despite statutory laws’ objectives of equality and justice. All things considered, despite advancements, social pressures, ignorance, and cultural norms continue to hinder women’s ability to exercise these rights in many places. The Constitution serves as a compass, promoting changes that close the gaps between individual laws and the ideals of equality.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF WOMEN’S PROPERTY RIGHTS IN INDIA
Strength of Current Laws:- Personal and statutory laws in India safeguard women’s property rights. Daughters are granted equal property rights under the 1936 and 2005 amendments to the Hindu Succession Act. Christian and Parsi inheritance rights are protected under the Indian Succession Act (1925). For financial stability, Muslim personal law offers Mahr and Quranic shares. Together, these laws uphold women’s rights of property ownership, inheritance, and marriage, guaranteeing equality under Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.
Practice Gaps and Challenges: -Women still have difficulty implementing their rights in spite of strong legislative frameworks. Women are frequently stopped from claiming property by social norms, ignorance, family pressure, and slow legal procedures. Gender-based disparities still exist in some groups, especially under Muslim inheritance laws, highlighting the disconnect between the law and ordinary life.
Landmark Court Judgments:- Women’s rights have been strengthened by judicial action. Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma (2020) upheld the coparcenary rights of daughters for Hindus. Shabnam v. Abdul Mannan (2008) clarified inheritance shares in the Muslim context. The 1992 case of Jasvinder Kaur vs. Kuldip Singh reinforced statutory inheritance claims for Parsis. Mary Roy v. State of Kerala (1986) guaranteed equal inheritance for daughters among Christians. These instances show how courts have supported women’s financial independence by bridging the gap between the law and practice.
CONCLUSION
In India, the evolution of women’s property rights shows a shift from historical restrictions to modern legal empowerment. Laws in Hinduism, Islam, Zoroastrianism and Christianity all acknowledge property ownership, inheritance, and marriage, yet there are still real-world disparities. These rights have been reinforced by historical reforms, codified legislation, and significantjudicialrulings,underscoringtheequalityguaranteedbytheconstitution.Completeand successful implementation is necessary to promote justice, equality, and inclusive growth in addition to ensuring women’s financial independence. By defending and upholding these rights, India can make its goal of having a just and equal society a reality.
REFERENCES
- Halder, D., & Jaishankar, K. (2008). Property rights of Hindu women: A feminist review of succession laws of ancient, medieval, and modern India. Journal of law and religion, 24(2), 663 687.
- Patel, R. (2013). Hindu women’s property rights in India: a critical appraisal. In The Politics of Rights (pp. 81-94). Routledge.
- Bishin, B. G., & Cherif, F. M. (2017). Women, property rights, and Islam. Comparative Politics, 49(4), 501-520.
- Aslam, A., & Kazmi, S. (2009). Muslim women and property rights. Economic Affairs, 29(2), 10-15
- Vevaina, L. (2018). She’s come undone: Parsi women’s property and propriety under the law. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 41(1), 44-59.
- Vevaina, L. S. (2014). Trust Matters: Parsis and Property in Mumbai (Doctoral dissertation, The New School).
- Parihar, N. Property rights of women in different religions in India.
- Bhosale, A. (2023). Addressing the Patriarchal Themes in Christian Personal Law in India-A Perspective. Jus Corpus LJ, 4, 647.
- Vidyuth, G., & Akhila, R. (2023). Granting of Maintenance for Women under Hindu and Muslim Laws and Property Rights in Christian Laws. Issue 6 Int’l JL Mgmt. & Human., 6, 1164.
