UNVEILING JUSTICE: UNDERSTANDING MUSLIM WOMEN’S LEGAL RIGHTS IN MODERN INDIA

“I raise up my voice – not so that I can shout, but so that those without a voice can be heard.— Malala Yousafzai”

Introduction: Context and Challenges

Muslim women in India live at the intersection of gender and minority status. As one MARG report notes, they face “double discrimination”– from traditional patriarchy and from being a religious minority leading to widespread exclusion and oppression. This is despite India’s progressive Constitution and many pro-women laws.

In practice, most Muslim women remain unaware of their legal rights and lack support to enforce them. According to recent surveys, an overwhelming majority of Muslim women report having no property in their name, and over 95% had never even heard of the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), the body that speaks for their community’s laws.

Muslims constitute a significant minority— about 14.2% of India’s population (approximately 172 million people) according to the 2011 Census. However, more recent Pew Research Center projections (2021) estimate that by 2024, the Muslim population has risen to around 15% of India’s total, making it one of the world’s largest Muslim populations after Indonesia and Pakistan.

Debates over their personal laws therefore have national impact. In the post-independence era, India preserved a separate “Muslim Personal Law” governing marriage, divorce, inheritance and other family matters, under the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act 1937.

This legal autonomy – rooted in the colonial-era Hastings Plan of 1772 – was intended to protect minority identity. But it also meant that issues like talaq (divorce), polygamy, and inheritance shares are determined by religious rules rather than uniform civil law. Weaving through this history are dynamic reformist threads: Islamic scholars and leaders have long pointed out that the Quran actually guarantees rights to women (inheritance, maintenance, divorce) and urged reforms consistent with those principles.

In this article we trace that evolution – the historical background, key court cases and laws, and the vibrant activism today – to understand the current status of Muslim women’s legal rights in India. Ultimately, this exploration seeks to uncover how the pursuit of justice, autonomy, and equality continues to shape the lives of Muslim women in modern India.

Historical Background & Early Reformers

From colonial times onward, debates over Muslim personal law took shape in India. The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 was a watershed moment— it declared that in matters like marriage, divorce, succession and adoption, Muslims would follow “the law of the Quran”. Importantly, the Shariat Act did not itself specify the exact rules or inheritance shares; rather, it placed Islamic law on statutory footing, clarifying that Muslims were to be governed by Sharia-based family and inheritance law. This helped avoid confusion but also cemented religious personal law as the framework for Muslim families in India.

The Spirit of Islam – the idea that Islamic law itself could empower women – was championed by several early Muslim reformers.

Syed Ameer Ali (d.1928), a Calcutta-born jurist and historian, argued in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that Islam guaranteed women substantial rights: an inherited share of property, a dower (mehr) from marriage, the right to divorce (khula), and protection against misuse of polygamy. Similarly, Sayyid Mumtaz Ali, another turn-of-the-century reformer, insisted that women’s testimony in court should be equal to men’s, and that Islam’s original intent was to uplift women beyond oppressive cultural traditions.

Female leaders in princely India echoed these reformist ideas. Sultan Jahan Begum of Bhopal — a progressive ruler and the first female Vice-Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University— used her speeches and writings in the 1920s to affirm that true Sharī‘a (Islamic law) protected women’s equality more than any other system. She even argued that a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) could diminish Muslim women’s rights, rather than strengthen them. As President of the All-India Women’s Conference (1928), she also advocated for raising the minimum age of marriage, helping inspire the Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929, and countering early conservative claims — later echoed by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB)– that reform was against Islam.

These intellectual currents show that reform from within Islam has deep roots. In fact, many early reformers used the very language of Sharia to argue for gender justice. These intellectual currents demonstrate that reform from within Islam has deep roots. Many early reformers deliberately used the language of Sharia to argue for gender justice and equality. The constitutional guarantee of religious freedom (Article 25) later enabled Muslims to maintain their own personal laws, but it also framed a lasting dilemma:

Should women’s rights be advanced through religious interpretation, or by state legislation that overrides it?

This tension between community rights and individual rights has remained central to minority politics in India. As sociologist Katherine Lemons observes, landmark cases such as Shah Bano (1985) and Danial Latifi (2001) “placed Muslim women at the symbolic center” of debates over whether community autonomy should override constitutional equality. In practice, reformers and activists have continued to navigate both arenas — invoking progressive Islamic principles while also relying on courts and democratic mechanisms to secure those very rights.

Building on these early reformist foundations, the next section explores how Islamic principles themselves — when properly interpreted — have long recognized women’s dignity, equality, and legal independence.

Islamic Principles on Women’s Rights

Understanding the evolution of Muslim women’s rights requires recalling that classical Islamic law — as interpreted by many scholars — actually grants women several specific legal and economic rights. Under traditional Sharī‘a inheritance rules (applied through the Shariat Act, 1937), a daughter is entitled to half the share of a son. A widow without children receives one-quarter of her deceased husband’s estate; with children, she inherits one-eighth.

These quotas may appear unequal by modern egalitarian standards, but they nonetheless guarantee women a protected and independent share of property. Importantly, the Qur’an also restricts how much can be bequeathed by will (wasiyyah) to third parties — no more than one-third of the total property — thereby ensuring that fixed heirs (sons, daughters, spouses) receive their rightful shares.

Islamic law also establishes the principles of maintenance (nafaqah) and dower (mehr). A wife’s mehr is her absolute right — a mandatory gift from the groom at marriage, which may be paid immediately or deferred, but remains entirely her personal property. In cases of divorce or widowhood, a Muslim wife is entitled to maintenance. Classical Sharī‘a required a husband to support his divorced wife during the three-month waiting period (iddat); beyond that, she could seek help from her family and, failing that, from community institutions such as the Waqf Board. These traditional provisions formed the legal and moral foundation of the landmark Supreme Court judgment in the Shah Bano case (1985), which upheld a divorced Muslim woman’s right to lifetime maintenance by invoking the broader secular law under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

The practice of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) — or “criminal divorce” — was never prescribed in the Qur’an; it evolved as a later, extra-Quranic innovation. The Qur’an instead lays down a gradual process of separation, spanning three pronouncements over three months, intended to prevent rash and impulsive divorces.

Moreover, Muslim women also possess avenues to initiate divorce. The khula system allows a wife to end the marriage by returning her dower or agreed property, and this right has been recognized for centuries in Islamic jurisprudence. The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, enacted during the British period, explicitly grants women the right to divorce on grounds such as cruelty, desertion, or failure to provide maintenance.

In sum, Islamic law — in principle — secures women’s rights to inheritance, maintenance, and even divorce, albeit within a patriarchal interpretive framework. Reformist voices have long emphasized that the Qur’an’s true spirit is inherently just and egalitarian, urging the community to revive these original principles rather than follow restrictive customary practices.

These theological foundations, however, often collide with how personal laws are interpreted and enforced in modern India — a tension most visibly reflected in landmark judicial battles.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

The Supreme Court of India building (New Delhi) has been the scene of historic judgments on Muslim personal law. In the 1985 Shah Bano, 2001 Danial Latifi, and 2017 Shayara Bano cases, the Court confronted the delicate balance between Muslim community law and individual rights.

India’s highest courts have repeatedly addressed Muslim women’s rights, often sparking intense debate. The landmark Shah Bano Begum (1985) case was a flashpoint. Shah Bano, a 62-year-old divorced Muslim woman, filed for maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC. In 1985, the Supreme Court — led by Justice Y. V. Chandrachud — upheld her right to alimony for life, invoking secular maintenance law, even though her marriage was governed by Muslim law.

The Court noted that no provision in Muslim law explicitly barred her claim, and emphasized that Section 125 applied to all religions. This decision enraged conservative ulema and led Parliament (under PM Rajiv Gandhi) to pass the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, which effectively overturned the Shah Bano judgment. The 1986 Act limited a divorced Muslim woman’s maintenance to the three-month iddat period, provided by her husband, and barred unilateral filing under the CrPC unless she agreed.

This set the stage for a second showdown: Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001). Advocate Danial Latifi, who had also been counsel for Shah Bano, challenged the 1986 Act as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court reinterpreted the Act in a groundbreaking manner. The Court held that the Act required a “fair and reasonable provision” for the divorced wife to be made within the iddat period, but that this provision could cover her maintenance for the rest of her life.

In effect, iddat became only a deadline for payment, not a cutoff on support. This upheld Muslim women’s post-divorce support in practice, while technically preserving the 1986 law. As one lay summary explains, under Latifi, a husband must “within 3 months…give [the divorced wife] the money or property she will ‘fairly and reasonably’ need to maintain her for the rest of her life.” The Latifi case thus balanced the Court’s pro-woman stance with the legislature’s will, but required a creative reading of the law.

The most recent landmark case was Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017), concerning instant triple talaq. A Muslim woman, Shayara Bano, had been divorced by her husband who uttered “talaq” three times at once. In August 2017, a five-judge Supreme Court bench (3–2 majority) held that unilateral instant talaq (talaq-e-biddat) is unconstitutional. The Court ruled that this practice violated Muslim women’s fundamental rights to equality and dignity. As a result, any triple talaq declared (or written/electronic) after the verdict is legally void.

Key Case Timeline

• 1985 – Shah Bano: SC upholds divorced Muslim woman’s right to maintenance under secular law.
• 1986 – Muslim Women’s (Divorce) Act: Parliament overturns Shah Bano by restricting maintenance to iddat.
• 2001 – Danial Latifi: SC reinterprets the 1986 Act to require “fair and reasonable” lifetime support (paid within iddat).
• 2017 – Shayara Bano: SC strikes down instant triple talaq as unconstitutional, reinforcing women’s fundamental rights.

These cases illustrate the Supreme Court walking a tightrope between constitutional guarantees and community autonomy. Each decision centered Muslim women’s rights — their right to live with dignity and financial security — even as it ignited political debates over secularism and religious law.

Following these judicial interventions, several key legislations and reforms further shaped Muslim women’s legal landscape, which we explore in the next section.

Key Legal Reforms & Legislation

Following Shayara Bano, Parliament enacted the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 (commonly called the Triple Talaq Act). This law explicitly criminalizes instant triple talaq: any declaration of talaq by a Muslim man — whether spoken, written, or digital — is “void and illegal.”

The Act makes instant talaq a cognizable offense, punishable by up to three years’ imprisonment for the husband. Crucially, the Act also affirms that a divorced woman has the right to maintenance for herself and her minor children. In effect, the 2019 law empowers Shayara Bano’s victims with legal recourse: the practice of “triple talaq at one sitting” is now a punishable crime, and aggrieved wives can seek immediate redress.

Other recent legislative changes, though not specific to Muslims, also impact these issues. In 2024, India overhauled its criminal justice codes: the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) was replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) on July 1, 2024. The new BNSS retains maintenance provisions equivalent to the old Section 125 CrPC (now Section 144).

Notably, in Mohd Abdul Samad v. State of Telangana (2024), the Supreme Court affirmed that a Muslim woman illegally divorced via triple talaq can claim maintenance under this criminal law.

Thus, post-2019, a divorced Muslim woman now has two avenues for support:

1. Criminal law provisions under BNSS/CrPC, and
2. Protections under the Triple Talaq Act.

This dual framework underscores that reform continues at multiple levels, combining criminal enforcement with civil rights protections to secure justice for Muslim women. Despite these reforms, ongoing debates around Uniform Civil Code, inheritance inequality, and polygamy reveal that the struggle for legal and social equality for Muslim women is far from over.

Ongoing Debates: UCC, Inheritance, Polygamy

The landmark reforms have not ended the discussion. Three major flashpoints remain:

1. Uniform Civil Code (UCC): The Indian Constitution’s Article 44 urges that “the State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code for the whole of India.” For decades, activists and courts have debated whether a UCC — one law for all personal matters — should replace religious family laws. Proponents argue that a UCC is essential for gender equality, ensuring that all communities follow the same rules on marriage, divorce, and inheritance. Opponents fear it could be used to homogenize diversity and override minority rights. At the federal level, no UCC has been implemented, but Uttarakhand made headlines in February 2024 by adopting a state-level UCC. Uttarakhand’s law applies the same rules of marriage, divorce, and succession to everyone, effectively banning polygamy and triple talaq within the state. Proponents claim this ensures equal rights for women, while critics — including many Muslim groups — see it as an infringement on religious autonomy.The Uttarakhand example illustrates how the debate is evolving: in the coming years, it remains to be seen whether more states will follow suit or whether a national compromise will emerge.
2. Inheritance Inequality: Under Muslim personal law, women’s inheritance shares are generally half that of men for the same relationship. 🔹Added clarity🔹 Daughters inherit half of what sons do, and wives receive one-quarter (or one-eighth if there are children). Some activists label this “inherently unequal,” while others defend it as compensating men’s larger financial responsibilities (such as paying mehr and supporting families). The law itself is clear: the 1937 Shariat Act codified these Quranic shares but did not alter them. Calls for equal inheritance continue; for instance, Uttarakhand’s UCC grants daughters and sons equal shares. At the national level, this tension remains unresolved: while Indian succession law can override Sharia in interfaith marriages (via the Indian Succession Act, 1925), for most Muslims, an equal-share reform would require either judicial reinterpretation or new legislation.
3. Polygamy: Muslim law permits a man to have up to four wives (with conditions), while Hindu law bans polygamy outright. The question of polygamy often intersects with gender justice. Many Muslim women’s groups call for its abolition, arguing that it often leads to injustice and inequality. In 2014, BMMA released a draft “Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act” recommending banning polygamy, nikah halala, and related practices. The issue reached the Supreme Court in late 2022, when BMMA filed a PIL on polygamy and other practices. Their report found overwhelming discontent: 84% of Muslim women surveyed felt polygamy should be prohibited, and 73% said a man should be penalized for taking a second wife. The Court has issued notices on the PIL, but a decision may take time. For now, unlike triple talaq, polygamy remains legal for Muslims in India, though it is actively debated by activists and some judges. (Notably, the Uttarakhand UCC explicitly bans polygamy.)

Other Ongoing Debates

Beyond these three, debates continue over:

• Anti-conversion laws in some states
• Child marriage, where Muslim personal law sets puberty as the minimum, but secular law sets 18

Many voices from the Hindu side argue that banning triple talaq or polygamy could open the door to challenging other Muslim practices, making every reform highly contested.

At the same time, Muslim reformist voices continue to push for change from within. As one analysis notes:

“Many sections of Muslim society have suggested removing certain practices from [Muslim personal law] (for example, triple talaq)”

These groups advocate codification of progressive Muslim family law, much like Hindu or Parsi law, a vision championed by organizations such as the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA) and the Muslim Women’s Movement.

The ongoing debates demonstrate that legal reform alone is insufficient; grassroots activism and reform from within the community continue to play a critical role in advancing women’s rights.

Grassroots Activism and Reform from Within

While courts and parliaments debate, Muslim women themselves have been driving change on the ground. The Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA), founded in 2011, is a leading example. This autonomous, secular organization has carried out large surveys and campaigns to push for reform.

A BMMA study of over 4,000 women found that 82% had no property of their own and 78% were homemakers with no income. Shockingly, 95.5% had never even heard of the AIMPLB, underscoring how disconnected policy-makers can be from ordinary women.

Armed with this data, BMMA launched signature campaigns and petitions. They collected over 50,000 signatures in support of banning instant triple talaq, and met with the Prime Minister to demand codified Muslim family law. Their activism helped create political momentum for the 2019 law.

BMMA’s advocacy extends beyond petitions. In 2014, they drafted a “Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act” to make practices like polygamy illegal. In 2016, they released a report on polygamous marriages, documenting the trauma and hardship faced by women whose husbands took second wives. 84% of the women surveyed said polygamy should be prohibited.

That report, combined with continued activism, prompted the Supreme Court to act: in late 2022, the Court issued notices on BMMA’s public interest plea to abolish polygamy.

BMMA has also pioneered female Qazis (Islamic jurists). In 2016, it established the Darul Uloom Niswan, a madrasa to train women as Qazis capable of hearing Sharia-based cases. These female Qazis now run women’s Sharia courts in cities like Mumbai and Ahmedabad. They mediate divorce, inheritance, and maintenance disputes, and solemnize marriages.

Crucially, they counter the narrative of male clerics by interpreting Sharī‘a from a gender-just perspective. For example, one goal is to challenge fatwas that endorsed unilateral triple talaq or demanded halala (forced remarriage). This model of “Islamic feminism” at work — women using Islamic legal reasoning to support women’s rights — exemplifies how change is emerging from within the community.

Other organizations join this push. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) itself sometimes includes women on panels to discuss reform, and the Indian Muslim Women’s Movement (IWM) calls for codified Muslim law. Even some conservative institutions have begun Sharia courts for women (dar-ul-qazas), though these exist in a legal gray zone.

The point is that Muslim women’s agency is evident: they are not just passive recipients of rights, but active agents shaping the discourse, whether through grassroots surveys, PILs, public campaigns, or even by entering spaces (like the Shani Shingnapur temple case) to assert their own identities.

This activism illustrates that legal reforms, judicial judgments, and legislative changes are most effective when supported by grassroots movements that empower women to claim and enforce their rights.

Contemporary Tensions: Hijab and Access to Justice

Two flashpoints illustrate the cultural-legal tensions of today:

• Hijab Debate: First, the hijab issue. In 2022–2023, the wearing of the hijab (headscarf) in schools and public institutions roiled India, especially in Karnataka. Some institutions banned head coverings in the name of uniformity and secularism, while Muslim girls insisted the hijab is a religious practice. Courts grappled with whether the hijab was an essential part of Islam and whether banning it violated religious freedom. (As of this writing, the dispute is unresolved in the Supreme Court.) This episode crystallizes the larger conflict: to what extent can the state regulate a religious practice for the sake of a “common uniform” or safety, versus preserving individual religious rights? Notably, some Muslim feminist leaders have critiqued the imposition of the hijab. BMMA co-founder Noorjehan Safia Niaz has publicly stated that she does not regard the hijab as mandatory, and is troubled by public shaming of women who choose different attire. This diversity of opinion among Muslim women — some asserting hijab as identity, others advocating choice — underscores how religious practice and women’s rights can clash in complex ways.
• Access to Justice: Second, access to justice. Even with laws on the books, Muslim women often face hurdles in enforcing their rights. A chief obstacle is lack of awareness and resources. As noted earlier, the majority do not even know about the bodies that govern their laws. Many women experiencing domestic abuse or illegal talaq live in rural or conservative settings, making court access daunting. Language and literacy barriers also impede legal recourse. The MARG report notes that generic “pro-women” laws have often failed minority women, as they cannot access these legal remedies. Practical issues exacerbate this: Muslim marriages are often unregistered, so proving marital status in court can be difficult. Some women turn to local darfī arbitration (men-only clerical councils) instead of courts, which may or may not be fair. In recent years, efforts have been made to improve legal aid and awareness. NGOs and commissions (such as the National Commission for Women) conduct legal literacy camps in minority areas. The Triple Talaq Act, 2019 also created local reconciliation boards (similar to family courts) to help women file complaints. In 2022, the Supreme Court in Shayara Bano clarified that practices such as talaq-e-hasan (spread over three months) remain permissible, and khula (mutual divorce) is available, inviting women to use these existing Islamic options before seeking court dissolution. Nonetheless, deep gaps remain. Activists emphasize that as long as women lack education and legal support, even the best laws will not be fully effective. Bridging this gap — through community outreach, empowering female Qazis, and stronger legal aid — is an ongoing project.

Conclusion: Balancing Rights, Autonomy, and Agency

The story of Muslim women’s legal rights in India is one of tension and transformation. It is shaped by constitutional values of equality and secularism, yet constrained by the pledge to respect religious communities. Courts and legislators have often stepped in on the side of gender justice — as in the Shah Bano and Shayara Bano cases — only to be met with political backlash demanding community autonomy. The result is a delicate balance: Muslim women cannot simply be treated as generic secular citizens (their personal laws are enshrined in special status), but neither can they be denied the fundamental rights others enjoy.

As commentator Siobhan Lambert-Hurley notes, Islamic law is not static. Historical precedents in India show that more favorable interpretations of Sharī‘a have been used to advocate women’s equality. Reformers of the past, and activists of today, remind us that Islam’s foundational texts can be read to support women’s rights — including inheritance, divorce, education, and political voice — rather than oppress them. In the current era, many suggest that the path forward is not a blunt abolition of all personal laws, but encouraging intra-community reform grounded in Islamic principles and constitutional guarantees.

At the same time, the agency of Muslim women themselves is the crucial variable. Grassroots movements — BMMA’s campaigns, women judges of the Darul Uloom, and thousands of women filing their own petitions — prove that change can come from within the community as much as from outside. The Constitution provides the right to religion and guarantees equality before the law; Muslim women stand at this intersection. The challenge for India’s pluralist democracy is to respect community autonomy without sacrificing individual rights. This means pushing for codification and reform of personal law that embodies gender justice — for example

• Codified marriage laws
• Ending polygamy
• Equal inheritance for daughters

…while ensuring that religious freedoms are not used to justify discrimination.

Looking forward, the dialogue is shifting. The Uttarakhand UCC experiment, Supreme Court notices on polygamy, and evolving public opinion all show that Indian society is grappling with these issues. Lawmakers, judges, and communities must heed what activists have long emphasized: Muslim women are not passive victims of tradition — they have articulated their needs loudly and clearly.

Any sustainable solution will empower them to live with the full dignity that both the Quran and the Constitution envision. In the words of scholars, the future lies in building on the best of both worlds: harnessing Sharī‘a’s emancipatory principles while applying secular laws to ensure that those principles become reality.

Only by centering Muslim women’s own voices — their constitutional rights, religious values, and creative legal agency — can India craft a just and inclusive family law landscape for all.

References

1. All India Muslim Personal Law Board. (n.d.). About AIMPLB.
   Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_India_Muslim_Personal_Law_Board
2. Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA). (2014). Draft Muslim Marriage and
   Divorce Act.
   Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharatiya_Muslim_Mahila_Andolan
3. Report on polygamous marriages in India.
   Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-61351784
   https://resmilitaris.net/uploads/paper/63b9cfee39d956bef7b587b061c07d8a.pdf
   https://bmmaindia.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/triple-talaq-report.pdf
4. Hindustan Times. (n.d.). Muslim women’s rights in India: Reform and legal battles.
   Retrieved from
   https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/mumbai-news/muslim-women-s-body-demands-r
   eform-in-family-law-legal-protection-101671561734080.html
   https://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/muslim-personal-law-needs-to-be-rehauled-101
   661959422848.html
   https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/muslim-women-don-t-want-change-in-laws
   on-triple-talaq-scholar/story-9JqVB2Agl4gbMtzR9JgDHN.html
5. iPleaders Blog. (n.d.). Muslim personal law and women’s rights in India.
   Retrieved from https://blog.ipleaders.in/rights-of-muslim-women-in-india/
6. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. (2011). Census of India 2011: Religion
   data.
   Retrieved from https://censusindia.gov.in
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_census_of_India
7. Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017). Supreme Court of India.
   Retrieved from
   https://www.drishtijudiciary.com/landmark-judgement/muslim-law/shayara-bano-v-union-of-india-and-ors-air-2017-sc-4609
   https://indiankanoon.org/doc/115701246/
   https://blog.ipleaders.in/shayara-bano-v-union-of-india/
   https://vidhiparivartan.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Paper-6.pdf
8. Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, (1985). Supreme Court of India.
   Retrieved from
   https://www.drishtijudiciary.com/landmark-judgement/muslim-law/mohd-ahmad-khan-v
   shah-bano-begum-1985-scr-3-844
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohd._Ahmed_Khan_v._Shah_Bano_Begum
   https://blog.ipleaders.in/case-law-summary-mohd-ahmed-khan-v-shah-bano-begum-other
   s-1985-air-945/
9. Danial Latifi v. Union of India, (2001). Supreme Court of India.
   Retrieved from https://blog.ipleaders.in/danial-latifi-v-union-of-india-a-critical-analysis/
   https://www.drishtijudiciary.com/landmark-judgement/muslim-law/danial-latifi-v-union
   of-india-2001-7-scc-740
   https://indiankanoon.org/doc/410660/
10. Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.
    Retrieved from https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/11564/1/a2019-20.pdf
    https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/11564?locale=en
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Women_(Protection_of_Rights_on_Marriage)_Act
    ,_2019
11. MARG. (n.d.). Minority women and legal awareness report.
    Retrieved from https://www.ngo-marg.org/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283198378_Legal_Awareness-Hubris_for_Wo
    men_to_Combat_Violence
    https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/09/21/population-growth-and-religious-comp
    osition/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
12. Wikipedia.
    Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_talaq_in_India#:~:text=India%27s%20neighbouring
    %20countries%20%E2%80%94%20Pakistan%2C,khula%20%28mutually