ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN INDIA: AN OVERVIEW

Introduction

Environmental law in India has evolved significantly over the decades, reflecting growing awareness of environmental issues and the need for legal frameworks to address them. Laws in India is a comprehensive and evolves framework designed to address various environmental challenges and promote sustainable development. The legal framework includes a mix of constitutional provisions, legislative measures, regulatory authorities, and judicial interventions.

Constitutional Provisions

The Indian Constitution, adopted in 1950, has several provisions relevant to environmental protection:

• Directive Principles of State Policy: Article 48A mandates the state to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife.
• Fundamental Duties: Article 51A(g) requires citizens to protect and improve the natural environment.
• Article 48A: Directs the State to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife.

Fundamental Duties

• Article 51A(g): Requires every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment, including forests, lakes, rivers, and wildlife.

Legislative Framework

India has enacted several laws aimed at environmental protection, addressing various aspects of environmental management:

The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986:

This is the umbrella legislation for environmental protection. It grants the central government broad powers to take measures for the protection and improvement of the environment. It also provides for the establishment of environmental authorities.

Purpose:

The primary aim of the Act is to provide a framework for environmental protection and to ensure that the country’s environmental resources are safeguarded for future generations. It allows the central government to take measures to control and prevent environmental pollution and promote sustainable development.

Scope:

The Act gives the central government the authority to take actions for the protection and improvement of the environment. It covers a wide range of environmental issues, including air and water pollution, hazardous waste management, and the conservation of natural resources.

Powers:

The Act empowers the government to take a range of actions, including:

• Setting standards for emissions and discharges.
• Regulating the handling of hazardous substances.
• Conducting environmental impact assessments for development projects.
• Issuing directives to prevent and control pollution.

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974:

This Act addresses the control and prevention of water pollution. It established the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) to oversee compliance and enforcement.

Purpose:

The primary objective of the Water Act is to prevent and control water pollution and to maintain or restore the quality of water bodies in India. It aims to ensure that the water remains safe for various uses such as drinking, agriculture, and industrial purposes.

Central and State Pollution Control Boards:

• Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB): Established under the Act to advise and coordinate the activities of State Pollution Control Boards and to develop policies for water pollution control at the national level.
• State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs): Established by state governments to implement the provisions of the Act at the state level, including monitoring and controlling pollution.

Pollution Control Measures:

• The Act mandates the setting of standards for the discharge of pollutants into water bodies. It requires industries and other establishments to obtain consent from the State Pollution Control Boards before discharging pollutants.
• It provides for the regulation of the discharge of pollutants through various means, including the issuance of permits and compliance with standards.

Provisions for Preventive Measures:

• The Act outlines measures for the prevention of water pollution, including requirements for treatment facilities for industrial and domestic waste before discharge into water bodies.

Penalties and Legal Action:

• The Act prescribes penalties for non-compliance with its provisions. Offenders may face fines and imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the offense.

Powers of Authorities:

• The Act grants powers to authorities to inspect facilities, collect samples of effluents, and take action against those violating pollution norms.

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981:

Similar to the Water Act, this law focuses on controlling air pollution. It also provides for the establishment of the CPCB and SPCBs.

Purpose:

The Air Act was enacted to:

• Prevent and control air pollution.
• Maintain and improve air quality for the protection and preservation of human health, vegetation, and property.

Central and State Pollution Control Boards:

• Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB): Oversees the implementation of the Act at the national level, sets air quality standards, and coordinates with State Pollution Control Boards.
• State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs): Responsible for implementing the Act’s provisions at the state level, including monitoring air quality and enforcing regulations.

Standards and Regulations:

• The Act empowers the CPCB to set air quality standards for various pollutants.
• It requires industries and other sources of pollution to adhere to these standards, including obtaining consent to operate from the SPCBs.

Prevention and Control Measures:

• The Act mandates the installation of pollution control equipment and technologies to minimize emissions.
• It outlines procedures for obtaining consent for the establishment and operation of facilities that emit pollutants.

Penalties and Enforcement:

• The Act prescribes penalties for non-compliance, including fines and imprisonment for violations of air quality standards or failure to obtain necessary consents.
• Authorities are empowered to take action against offenders, including shutting down operations or directing the installation of pollution control measures.

Powers of Authorities:

• The Act grants authorities the power to inspect premises, collect samples of air pollutants, and take legal action against violators.

Public Awareness and Participation:

• The Act encourages public awareness about air pollution issues and promotes community involvement in pollution control efforts.

The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972:

This Act provides for the protection of wildlife and their habitats. It establishes national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, and the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau.

Purpose:

The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, was enacted to:

• Protect and conserve wildlife and their habitats.
• Regulate hunting and trade in wildlife and wildlife products.
• Promote the establishment of protected areas, such as national parks and wildlife sanctuaries.

Key Features

Protected Areas:

• National Parks: Designated areas where wildlife and their habitats are protected from disturbance, and activities that may harm the environment are regulated.
• Wildlife Sanctuaries: Areas designated for the protection of wildlife, where certain activities may be regulated to ensure the safety and preservation of the wildlife.

Wildlife Advisory Boards:

• National Board for Wildlife: Provides overall guidance on wildlife conservation policy and planning at the national level.
• State Wildlife Advisory Boards: Advise on wildlife conservation matters at the state level and assist in the implementation of conservation policies.

Regulation of Hunting:

• The Act prohibits hunting of most wildlife species, except in specific cases where the hunting is permitted under strict regulations.
• It provides for the issuance of licenses for hunting, which are subject to conditions and oversight to prevent illegal hunting.

Endangered Species:

• The Act includes provisions for the protection of species listed as endangered or vulnerable. It regulates trade in these species and their products to prevent exploitation.

Wildlife Crime Control Bureau:

• The Act led to the establishment of the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB), which is responsible for tackling wildlife crime, including poaching and illegal trade in wildlife.

Penalties and Enforcement:

• The Act prescribes penalties for violations, including fines and imprisonment. Offenses include illegal hunting, trade in wildlife products, and encroachment on protected areas.
• Authorities are empowered to take action against violators, including the seizure of illegal goods and the prosecution of offenders.

Conservation Measures:

• The Act promotes various conservation measures, including habitat management, research on wildlife, and the education of the public about wildlife conservation.

The Forest Conservation Act, 1980:

This Act regulates the diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes and aims to conserve forest resources.

Purpose:

The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, was enacted to:

• Regulate the diversion of forest land for non-forest uses.
• Prevent the indiscriminate deforestation and degradation of forest areas.
• Promote the conservation and sustainable management of forest resources.

Key Features

Regulation of Forest Land Diversion:

• The Act mandates that any proposal for the diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes (such as agriculture, mining, or industrial activities) must be approved by the central government.
• The Act requires that before any forest land is diverted, the central government must be satisfied that the diversion is in the public interest and that compensatory measures are in place.

Forest Land Definition:

• The Act defines “forest land” to include all land that is recorded as forest in government records or has been classified as forest land, regardless of the legal status or ownership.

Approval Process:

• Proposals for the diversion of forest land must be submitted to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), which reviews and grants or denies approval based on the environmental impact and conservation considerations.

Compensatory Afforestation:

• The Act stipulates that whenever forest land is diverted, compensatory afforestation (planting trees on an equivalent area of non-forest land) must be carried out to offset the loss of forest cover.
• The Act also requires that a portion of the funds from the diversion process be used for afforestation and forest management activities.

Penalties and Enforcement:

• The Act prescribes penalties for violations, including fines and imprisonment for unauthorized clearing or encroachment of forest land.
• It empowers authorities to take legal action against individuals or entities that engage in illegal activities related to forest land.

Role of State Governments:

• State governments play a crucial role in implementing the Act by forwarding proposals for land diversion to the central government and ensuring compliance with the Act’s provisions at the state level.

Environmental Impact Assessment:

• While not explicitly required by the Forest Act itself, the process of forest land diversion typically involves an environmental impact assessment to evaluate the potential effects on the ecosystem and biodiversity.

The Biological Diversity Act, 2002:

This Act seeks to protect India’s biodiversity by regulating access to biological resources and ensuring equitable sharing of benefits.

Purpose:

The Biological Diversity Act, 2002, was enacted to

• Conserve biological diversity at the national, regional, and local levels.
• Promote the sustainable use of biological resources.
• Ensure the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of biological resources and traditional knowledge.

Key Features

National Biodiversity Authority (NBA):

• The Act established the National Biodiversity Authority to oversee the implementation of the Act and to provide guidance on biodiversity conservation issues at the national level.
• The NBA is responsible for granting approvals for the use of biological resources and traditional knowledge, particularly for commercial purposes.

State Biodiversity Boards (SBBs):

• The Act provides for the creation of State Biodiversity Boards in each state to manage biodiversity conservation efforts at the state level.
• SBBs are tasked with coordinating and implementing biodiversity-related activities within their respective states.

Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs):

• The Act encourages the formation of Biodiversity Management Committees at the local level (e.g., village or municipal level) to involve local communities in biodiversity conservation.
• BMCs are responsible for preparing People’s Biodiversity Registers, which document local biodiversity and traditional knowledge.

Access and Benefit Sharing:

• The Act regulates access to biological resources and associated traditional knowledge by requiring prior informed consent from the NBA for commercial use.
• It establishes a framework for benefit-sharing arrangements, ensuring that benefits derived from the use of biological resources are shared fairly with the local communities and indigenous peoples.

Conservation of Biological Diversity:

• The Act promotes in-situ conservation (conservation of species in their natural habitats) and ex-situ conservation (conservation of species outside their natural habitats, such as in gene banks or botanical gardens).
• It encourages the development of biodiversity conservation strategies and action plans.

Regulation of Trade:

• The Act regulates the export and import of biological resources and their derivatives to prevent overexploitation and ensure that trade activities are sustainable and lawful.

Penalties and Enforcement:

• The Act provides for penalties and legal actions for violations, including unauthorized access to biological resources, non-compliance with benefit-sharing agreements, and other breaches of the Act’s provisions.

The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010:

This Act established the National Green Tribunal (NGT) to handle environmental disputes and provide speedy justice in environmental matters.

Purpose:

The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, was enacted to:

• Provide a dedicated judicial mechanism to handle environmental disputes and grievances.
• Ensure the enforcement of environmental laws and regulations.
• Promote effective environmental justice and protect the environment by adjudicating cases related to environmental issues.

Key Features

Establishment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT):

• The NGT is established as a specialized tribunal with the authority to adjudicate matters related to environmental protection and conservation of forests and other natural resources.
• It has the power to hear cases involving violations of environmental laws and disputes related to environmental conservation.

Jurisdiction and Powers:

• The NGT has the authority to hear cases related to the implementation of environmental laws, including issues related to air and water pollution, forest conservation, and biodiversity.
• It has the power to grant relief and compensation for damage to the environment, including issuing orders for the restoration of damaged ecosystems and the payment of compensation to affected parties.

Composition:

• The NGT consists of a Chairperson, who is a retired Supreme Court or High Court judge, and other members with expertise in environmental matters.
• Members are appointed based on their qualifications and experience in environmental law, science, or management.

Suo Motu Powers:

• The NGT has the authority to take Suo motu (on its own motion) cognizance of environmental issues and cases, allowing it to address significant environmental concerns even if no formal complaint has been made.

Procedure:

• The NGT follows a quasi-judicial procedure, which is less formal than regular courts but ensures that all parties have an opportunity to present their case.
• It can summon witnesses, collect evidence, and conduct inspections as part of its proceedings.

Appeal and Review:

• Decisions of the NGT can be appealed to the Supreme Court of India. This ensures that there is a higher judicial review of the tribunal’s decisions.
• The NGT also has provisions for reviewing its own orders if new facts or circumstances arise.

Environmental Justice:

• The NGT is tasked with providing relief and compensation to victims of environmental degradation and ensuring that the principles of environmental justice are upheld.

Regulatory Authorities

• Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB): This body oversees national pollution control standards and coordinates with state-level agencies.
• State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs): These boards are responsible for implementing pollution control measures at the state level.
• National Green Tribunal (NGT): The NGT adjudicates on environmental disputes and provides relief and compensation.

Judicial Oversight

Indian courts, especially the Supreme Court and High Courts, have played a pivotal role in environmental protection through public interest litigation (PIL). Landmark judgments have reinforced environmental rights and established important precedents.

International Commitment

India is a party to various international environmental agreements, including the Paris Agreement on climate change and the Convention on Biological Diversity. These commitments influence domestic environmental policies and regulations.

Challenges and Developments

Despite the robust legal framework, challenges such as enforcement issues, bureaucratic hurdles, and inadequate resources persist. Recent developments focus on strengthening implementation mechanisms, increasing public awareness, and integrating sustainable practices into development policies.

Conclusion

India faces several challenges related to the implementation and enforcement of environmental laws. Despite having a comprehensive legal framework, including significant legislation such as the Environmental Protection Act, 1986, the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and others, the country encounters various problems in managing its environmental issues effectively. Here are some of the key problems:

1. Implementation Challenges

• Inadequate Enforcement: Enforcement of environmental laws is often weak due to limited resources, lack of trained personnel, and insufficient infrastructure. Regulatory agencies sometimes struggle to monitor and enforce compliance effectively.
• Bureaucratic Red Tape: The complex bureaucratic processes can delay decision-making and hinder timely action on environmental issues.

2. Judicial and Administrative Delays

• Backlog of Cases: The judicial system, including specialized bodies like the National Green Tribunal (NGT), often faces a backlog of cases, leading to delays in resolving environmental disputes and enforcing regulations.
• Slow Legal Processes: Lengthy legal procedures and appeals can delay justice and impact the effectiveness of environmental laws.

3. Public Awareness and Participation

• Lack of Awareness: Many communities and individuals are not fully aware of their rights and obligations under environmental laws, which can lead to non-compliance and inadequate public engagement in environmental protection.
• Limited Public Participation: There is often insufficient involvement of local communities in decision-making processes related to environmental conservation and development projects.

4. Coordination Issues

• Fragmented Approach: Environmental governance can be fragmented due to overlapping responsibilities between various central and state agencies, leading to inefficiencies and lack of cohesive action.
• Coordination Between Agencies: Poor coordination between different regulatory bodies, such as the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs), can undermine effective enforcement and management.

5. Economic and Development Pressures

• Conflicting Priorities: Rapid industrialization, urbanization, and economic development often take precedence over environmental concerns, leading to environmental degradation and challenges in balancing development with conservation.
• Resource Constraints: Limited financial resources allocated to environmental protection can impact the ability to implement and enforce laws effectively.

6. Pollution Control

• Industrial and Vehicular Pollution: Managing pollution from industries and vehicles remains a significant challenge, with inadequate infrastructure for pollution control and enforcement of emission standards.
• Waste Management: Inadequate waste management infrastructure and practices contribute to pollution and environmental degradation, including issues related to solid waste, hazardous waste, and electronic waste.

7. Climate Change and Environmental Degradation

• Adaptation and Mitigation: Addressing the impacts of climate change requires effective adaptation and mitigation strategies, which are often hindered by limited resources, lack of data, and insufficient integration of climate considerations into planning and policies.
• Loss of Biodiversity: Habitat destruction, pollution, and other factors lead to a loss of biodiversity, which poses challenges for conservation efforts and the protection of endangered species.

8. Illegal Activities

• Poaching and Illegal Trade: Wildlife poaching and illegal trade in endangered species continue to pose significant threats, often driven by inadequate enforcement and corruption.
• Encroachments and Deforestation: Encroachments on forest land and illegal deforestation activities contribute to environmental degradation and loss of forest cover.

To address these challenges, several measures can be taken:

• Strengthening Enforcement: Enhance the capacity and resources of regulatory agencies to improve enforcement and compliance.
• Improving Coordination: Foster better coordination between different agencies and levels of government to streamline environmental management.
• Increasing Public Awareness: Promote public awareness and education about environmental laws and the importance of conservation.
• Streamlining Legal Processes: Address judicial and administrative delays by improving legal processes and reducing case backlogs.
• Integrating Climate Action: Incorporate climate change considerations into policy and planning to address its impacts effectively.

Addressing these problems requires a comprehensive approach involving government action, public participation, and collaboration among various stakeholders.

References

1. DHAMEJA S.K (2005): Environmental Engineering and Management, Kataria Publication, New-Delhi.
2. MISRY K.U (2012): Fundamentals of Industrial Safety & Health – I, Siddharth Prakashan, Ah0medabad.
3. MISRY K.U (2012): Fundamentals of Industrial Safety & Health – II, Siddharth Prakashan, Ahmedabad.
4. LEELAKRISHNAN P. (2015): Environmental Law Case Book, LexisNexis.
5. SHANTAKUMAR S. (2005): Introduction to Environmental Law, LexisNexis.
6. SAHASRANAMAN P.B. (2012): Handbook of Environmental Law in India, Oxford University Press (India).
7. HOLDER JANE AND LEE MARIA (2012): Environmental Protection, Law and Policy, Cambridge University Press.
8. CHAPMAN S.R (1997): Environmental Law and Policy, Prentice Hall.
9. NAWNEET VIBHAV (2017): Environmental Law-An Introduction, LexisNexis.